《经济学人》精读71：Welcome an electric world. Worry about the transition
As fuels, oil and electricity have meaningfully different characteristics
OIL shaped the 20th century.? In war, ?the French leader Georges Clemenceau said, petroleum was “as vital as blood”.? In? peace ?the oil business dominated stock markets,? bankrolled? despots? and propped up the economies of entire countries. But the 21st century will see oil’s influence wane. Cheap natural gas, renewable energy, electric vehicles and coordinated efforts to tackle global warming together mean that the power source of choice will be electricity.
That is welcome. The electricity era will diminish the clout of the $2trn oil trade, reduce the choke points that have made oil a source of global tension, put energy production into local hands and make power more accessible to the poor. It will also make the world cleaner and safer—reassuringly dull, even. The trouble is getting from here to there. Not just oil producers, but everyone else, too, may find the transition? perilous .
bankroll: to supply money for ( a business, project, person, etc.)
despot: a ruler who has total power and who often uses that power in cruel and unfair ways
perilous: full of danger: dangerous
石油早就了20世纪，在战争年代，石油就像血液一样重要；在和平年代，它掌控着经济命脉...
Oil and electricity are a study in contrasts (see our special report). Oil is a wonder fuel, packed with more energy by weight than coal and by volume than natural gas (both still the main sources of electricity). It is easy to ship, store and turn into myriad refined products,? from petrol to plastics to pharmaceuticals. ?But it is found only in specific places favoured by geology. Its production is concentrated in a few hands, and its oligopolistic suppliers—from the Seven Sisters to OPEC and Russia—have consistently attempted to drip-feed it on to the market to keep prices high.Concentration and cartelisation make oil prone to crises and the governments of oil-rich states prone to corruption and abuse.
石油有很多的优点，很容易运输，储存和合成其他产品... from petrol to plastics to pharmaceuticals 记住这个表达?
但石油只产在某几个国家与地区，就让这些国家形成了垄断...
Different kettles of fuel
Electricity is less user-friendly than oil. It is hard to store, it loses its? oomph? when shipped over long distances, and its transmission and distribution require hands-on regulation. But in every other way, it promises a more peaceful world.
Electricity is hard to monopolise because it can be produced from numerous sources of fuel, from natural gas and nuclear to wind, solar, hydro and? biomass . The more these replace coal and oil as fuel for generation, the cleaner it promises to be. Given the right weather conditions, it is abundant geographically, too. Anyone can produce electricity—fromgreener-than-thou Germans to energy-poor Kenyans.
oomph: power or energy ( his argument lacks oomph; the truck doesn't have the oomph to haul the boat)
电力能源虽然不如石油方便，但是却不会被某几个国家垄断，很多方法可以产生电力能源：风力，太阳能，氢能等
True, the technologies used to produce electricity from renewable resources, and the rare earths and minerals that some, including solar panels and wind turbines, rely on, could be subject to protectionism and trade wars. China, which produces 85% of the world’s rare earths, sharply tightened export quotas in 2010 with OPEC-like zeal. America and the European Union have? slapped? tariffs on Chinese solar-panel imports. Yet the vital substances involved in generating and storing electricity are not burned up like oil. Once a stock of them exists it can for the most part be recycled. And, even if today’s output is concentrated, for most materials the planet has undeveloped deposits or substitutes that can? thwart? a would-be monopolist. Rare earths, for example, are not rare—one of them,? cerium , is almost as common as zinc.
Electricity also rewards co-operation.Because renewables are? intermittent , regional grids are needed to ship electricity from where it is plentiful to where it is not. This could replicate the pipeline politics that Russia engages in with its natural-gas shipments to Europe. More likely, as grids are interconnected so as to diversify supply, more interdependent countries will conclude that manipulating the market is self-defeating. After all, unlike gas, you cannot keep electricity in the ground.
thwart: to prevent someone from doing something or to stop something from happening
intermittent: starting, stopping, and starting again: not constant or steady
An electric world is therefore desirable.But getting there will be hard, for two reasons. First, as rents dry up, authoritarian oil-dependent governments could collapse. Few will miss them, but their passing could cause social unrest and strife. Oil producers had a taste of what is to come when the price plunged in 2014-16, which led to deep, and unpopular, austerity measures. Saudi Arabia and Russia have temporarily stopped the rot by curtailing production and pushing oil prices higher, as part of an“OPEC+” agreement. They need high prices to buy time to? wean? their economies off oil. But the higher the oil price, the greater the incentive for energy-thirsty behemoths like China and India to invest in renewable-powered electrification to give themselves cheaper and more secure supplies. Should the producers’ alliance crumble in the face of a long-term decline in demand for oil, prices could once again tumble, this time for good.
wean: to start feeding ( a child or young animal) food other than its mother's milk
从石油能源时代转换到电力能源时代是一个艰难的过程，第一个难点就是石油价格下降的话，这些产油国就会产生动荡和冲突...
That will lead to the second danger: the fallout for investors in oil assets. America’s frackers need only look at the country’s? woebegone? coalminers to catch a glimpse of their fate in a distant post-oil future. The International Energy Agency, a forecaster, reckons that, if action to limit global warming to below 2°C accelerates in coming years,$1trn of oil assets could be stranded, ie, rendered obsolete. If the transition is unexpectedly sudden, stockmarkets will be dangerously exposed.
The tension is inescapable.On the one hand government policy should press forward with the transition as fast as it can. On the other, a rapid transition will cause upheaval. Expect the big consumers, especially India and China, to force the pace.
woebegone: looking or feeling very sad
点评：矛盾是无法避免的，一方面各国政府希望尽快转变到可持续的能源（产油国除外），另一方面这个转变过程速度太快的话会造成动乱。一言以蔽之，就是钱惹的祸
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Results
Lexile?Measure: 1100L - 1200L
Mean Sentence Length: 16.09
Mean Log Word Frequency: 3.21
Word Count: 853
这篇文章的蓝思值是在1100-1200L， 是经济学人里普通难度的文章~
使用kindle断断续续地读《经济学人》三年，发现从一开始磕磕碰碰到现在比较顺畅地读完，进步很大，推荐购买！ 点击这里可以去亚马逊官网购买~